Paris Climate Agreement: 21+ Pros And Cons

 The supreme motto behind the Paris climate change is to save the nature of the earth. In these days, the carbon emission is widely killing Mother Nature and thus it becomes the worldwide destructing phenomenon which may present a turbulent future and environment to the incoming generation. 

Are we looking for bodily pleasures – gained from the wide use of AC, Cars and money related success in the cost of nature? Our nature and earth are on the verge of destruction because of the dangerous carbon emission gases. We use our nature and the natural resources extensively to earn a profit, Moreover, we habituated to the comfort that is acquired by various types of equipment or machines in our houses that produces so many dangerous gases and those gases harm our society as well as nature. 

Pros and Cons of Paris Climate Agreement

Pros of the Paris climate summit 

A promise save the future:

No longer our environment is secured, the society also the verge of the menace. The agreement prepares a long term planning to save the earth by the appropriate precautions for saving the earth.

The melting of the icebergs in the Antarctica subcontinent can flow the nations which are situated in the bank of the seas.  Do you believe that there is a world where people are fighting the battle of climate change under the one roof forgetting their dissimilarities? Of course, the heaven is existing! In 2015, to make the dream true, some of the great environment activists called for an international consciousness enhancement program which is usually referred to as the parish climate change.

A pool of balance between developed and developing countries:   

the countries that are fast forward and solvent towards their fiscal balances, will obviously fight with pollution without any such major difficulties, however, the poor country or the developing nations are not equipped enough to counter the upcoming threats as those countries don’t have the financial superiority. Even countries which are striving for the basic amenities, they can also achieve the environmental with the fund that advanced from the developing nation to save nature.

Globally supported and globally acclaimed:

the countries likewise the China, United States, India, Japan, Germany, Brazil, Canada, South Korea, Mexico and the United Kingdom, willingly involved in this agreement.

195 UNFCCC members of UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) has signed for the historic agreement in Paris to conserve the earth. Major contributors to the pollution in the world including China, the United States, India, Japan, and Germany have committed to reducing the carbon emission up to 50%. The agreement gives the enlightenment to mitigate the peripheral greenhouse gases which could destroy the whole world.

The agreement for creating sustainable jobs:  

A fine line always co-exist between the jobs which cause the threats to nature and the sustainable jobs that save nature. According to the summit, the participant countries should focus on the sustainable job or technology such as solar energy, energy from the biodegradable products.

Flexibility to the Legal bindings:

Unlike the Kyoto protocol, this summit has its flexibility towards the adjoining aspects and the implementation. The Kyoto protocol was stiff and rigid. For that reason, Canada has decided to stay out of the protocol. Many environment protection agreements such as the Kyoto protocol has been backlashed due to the high fines and tight rules. On the other hand, the agreement is comparatively flexible.

The consciousness of the government of many countries:

Observing the ignorance towards the environment is very common in the world. Countries enforce efforts to spectrums financial superiority. To gain finance superiority, instances of negligence towards the environment-friendly structure and infrastructure is commonly observed. China is the topmost carbon-emitting country, is not able to change the infrastructure the coal mines, which is the largest source of Carbon emission as its economy is reliant on that coal mines.

Cons of the Paris summit

Far from reality:  

the project is difficult to enforce in many countries because it needs a wide structural change and suddenly to change the whole infrastructure is impossible. 

Different rules in different states:

the rich countries will patronize the poor countries by offering them money, equipping the advanced technology, as sometimes it looks like very biased to the developed countries.

Will incur a lot of money:

Social scientist is a presumption that a huge involvement of the money related to the agreement. As sustainable technologies will be promoted, which may lay off the jobs that are accompanying the old technology-oriented sectors.

Possibility to harm the industrialization:

The shipping industry, manufacturing industry basically which is dependent of the fuels, may get the threats of abolishment. The actual cost of the widely acclaimed Paris Agreement for the U.S. As declared by President Trump, it might cost the U.S. $3 trillion by 2040 and $2.7 million jobs by 2025.

The leaders are keeping aside them from the issue:

The input to pollution is different in comparison to various countries. Therefore leaders are not coming forward unitedly. For instance, the US has withdrawn its support to the agreement by saying that, China is the real force of the pollution, still, China is not adopting the environment-friendly technologies. 

Pushing one countries burden to the other country:

 Often the protagonists and the critical thinkers says that the agreements are not realistic enough, because of the reason that a rich country, not likely to move forward to bear the burden of another poor country

Similar Posts:

What’s your Reaction?

Leave a Comment