A ‘plea bargaining’ basically refers to an agreement which occurs between the prosecutor and a defendant. It is basically a way to have a defendant plead either guilty to charges or no contest, which are bought against them without the cost of the trial. The prosecutors will often agree to decrease the charges and recommend lesser sentence lengths, and make some other compromise in the exchange of the pea.
There may be a number of advantages as well as disadvantages of plea bargaining. Actually, a Criminal trial may take several days in many circumstances, or some may take several weeks.
A plea bargain can make the trial skip a bit and go straight to the judge in order to discuss the sentencing. But, a plea bargain can even put innocent people in jail.
Pros and Cons of Plea bargaining:
Pros of Plea bargaining:
It helps to deal with the caseloads:
In the case of plea bargaining, the state, and the court, both typically aided in dealing with the caseloads. Also, the process reduces the prosecutors’ workload by allowing them to prepare for even more serious cases by leaving some effortless and petty charges in order to settle through.
It makes the trial scheduling uncongested.
For the judge of the court himself, the key advantage of accepting a plea bargain agreement is that he can alleviate the requirement to schedule and hold a particular trial on a docket which is already overcrowded.
The judges are also acquainted with the overcrowding in jails, so they may be receptive to process out offenders that are unlikely to do much jail time anyway. This eventually means the case might get closed much faster than the usual. And that is good for the society since the procedure de-clogs the systems of the court for some more serious and severe cases.
It hastens the methods of trials.
Plea bargains are often referred to as a significant factor for restructuring the by allowing them to agree to the blame for their trial and also by enabling them voluntarily submit before the law.
This allows them to carry out the entire process without having an expensive or time-consuming trial and thus help in hastening the process of the trial for them.
It eliminates the uncertainty of the case.
From the perspective of the criminal defence, the most useful and the most important benefit of this type of agreement is the capability of its to remove the uncertainty of a trial. It allows the defendants by assuring that they will not receive more severe charges for the criminal acts and cases filed against them.
It brings the greater possibilities to find the accused guilty.
When it happens that the prosecution becomes feeble or when the court wants the correct and proper witnesses or evidence against a particular case, and the outcome is likely acquittal, it is also possible that still, the prosecuting party will find the accused guilty.
Thus, plea bargaining bears the advantage of bringing more possibility to find a criminal guilty.
It prevents the case from getting worse.
When a charged individual or a person takes a plea bargain, he or she will not have to go through the trial. In other words, this means that some crimes, that may have been committed, and any damning evidence are not going to be discovered.
Thus, this prevents the entire prosecution process or the process of getting worse. Another one of the greatest reasons why many individuals opt for plea bargaining is the fact that they will not receive the maximum sentences for their crimes.
Here are some of the disadvantages of plea bargaining:
It may remove the right to have a trial by jury.
In the United States of America, every person has a Constitutional right for having a trial by the jury. So, offering a plea bargain to an individual in order to avoid that trial may seem like a coercive attempt in order to waive those rights.
Furthermore, pressuring a defendant into accepting a plea deal might also be deemed illegal. It is important that a defendant must always have the rights in order to take their case to trial for a plea bargain for being an effective tool.
It might lead to poor investigatory methodology.
Since most of the cases out there in many jurisdictions go for a plea bargain instead of a trial, there is a debate or an argument that had made that this concept leads to lackluster investigation practices.
The attorneys and the law enforcement officials might not spend their time for preparing a case because they have an expectation which it will plead out. Instead of trying to get justice, the goals are to make a deal. And, that could be argued that expecting a deal is not really regarded as justice.
It still creates criminal records for the innocent.
Sometimes due to the pressure, an innocent person may also agree to plea bargain out fear. He might say yes to plea bargain for cutting the losses. This agreement actually means that they will have a criminal record.
Also, they might be even asked to serve their time in prison. There may be some fines or sometimes some restitution to pay. And, even if a plea bargain is not accepted, there may be some legal expenses to pay which might be greater than the cost of what a bargain offers, and that leads to an acceptance of a deal.
Judges are not required to follow a plea bargain agreement:
The prosecutor and the defendant might agree for a plea bargain, but the judge can, however, void that agreement. A judge is not generally required to follow a plea bargain whatsoever.
They can anyway impose some longer sentences or can decide that no sentence should be imposed at all. A judge may also need a case to go to trial if they feel like a plea bargain is taking place offered in some bad faith.
Plea bargains eliminate the chance of an appeal:
If a case goes to a trial and a defendant loses, there might be several grounds on which the appeal may be filed.
Because of the fact that a plea bargain needs a defendant to plead guilty to the charges, even if they are reduced, it actually eliminates the ability to file an appeal in almost all circumstances.
It creates soft justice for the guilty:
In many situations or during a number of circumstances, a plea bargain tends to provide a lighter sentence for someone. It happens so even if they are guilty. It could be exploited as an escape route for a prosecutor. Some may even argue that a guilty plea and a guaranteed sentence is not the same thing as being found guilty of having an accurately imposed sentence.
The various disadvantages and advantages of plea bargaining could get the criminals off the streets, but it can also put some innocent people out there into prison. It might open up a court schedule but it also changes the effectiveness of the criminal justice system of a country.
- 20+ Differences Between Jail And Prison
- Being a Judge: 25 Pros and Cons
- 16+ Main Pros and Cons of Death Sentence
- 20+ Differences Between Libel And Slander
- 20+ Differences Between Arbitration And Mediation
Marketing | Branding | Blogging. These Three Words Describe Me in The Best Way. I Am a Self-Taught Marketer with 10 Years of Experience. Helping Startups/ It Companies/ and Small Businesses to Enhance Their Business Through Branding and Marketing Ideas. On A Mission to Help Small Businesses to Be a Brand.